I don’t have a lot of faith, but fantasy keeps alive what
little God gave me.
Each genre has its boundaries, some more stringent and
strange than others. Fantasy has plenty of hallmarks—impossible beasts, names
with lots of x’s and y’s, swords and magic and so on—but those are no what make
the genre so enticing to cynics like me. What draws us to fantasy is the common
narrative of overwhelming odds stacked against goodness.
Some people will always see the problems and the pain more
clearly than wisdom and solutions. That’s me. I am a glutton for the pain and
anger of the world, dismissing hope as trite and inspirational messages as
cliché. In my eagerness to see the worst and understand it, I lessen my
capacity for seeing that which is best.
There is something good in the world, the fantasy genre
says, and it is being stamped out. Crushed. Destroyed by the masses, most of
whom are not particularly evil. In fact, for a quality fantasy narrative,
simple evil is rare and usually well-hidden behind the smokescreen of evil’s
natural-born children. Apathy, selfishness, greed, and pride are mixed up in
the same people who sacrifice and love and share.
The mixed-up people have mixed-up options and they make
mixed-up decisions, but the best thing about fantasy is that good options aren’t
pure ideals or pristine values. The cleanliness of obvious goodness is just
another smokescreen for real goodness. Restoring relationships or honor.
Telling a truth or giving up the one thing she wanted so that he can have what
he needs. Even when people make a mess of its pursuit, we all see for a few
hundred pages of relieving clarity what goodness can be.
Redemption is always possible, for any character at any
moment. If they choose to break themselves for the sake of that which is good.
When I step away from the pages—reluctantly closing a book
about epic battles and return to the muffins I’m baking or the latest job
application I’ll never hear back about—the story remains. That which is good
remains.
I still don’t know what to do with the pit of worry in my
stomach or the fear in my heart or my failures and the mystery of unhappiness.
But fantasy stories clarify what I want.
I want that which is good, and that goodness, I think, is God.
So, I have a lot of pastors and preachers to thank:
Brian Jacques and Juliet Marillier. Megan Whalen Turner and
Brandon Sanderson. Patricia C. Wrede, Patrick Rothfuss, Tamora Pierce, Orson
Scott Card, and Sherwood Smith. It’s hard to put into words what these people
have done for my faith, but I do love a good challenge. And I need some subject
matter.
The game plan: a series of short author and book
reviews/love letters to authors. I hope not only to show my admiration, but
also share some reading options for you (and in return ask for your suggestions).
I don’t enjoy “difficult” books and authors who write them never make my lists:
I read page-turners with deep characters written by authors that can create a
serious situation that makes you both laugh and cry.
Have you read the Dark Is Rising series?
ReplyDeleteI have, but I read them in my read-every-book-in-a-day phase of middle school. It's sort of a blur of words, so I don't remember much. Ought to give them another try.
DeleteI still love Daughter of the Forest all these years since I first read it. If you like anything with complex plot and deep characters, Stephen King's Dark Tower series is an amazing ride. Or the stand-alone Under the Dome.
ReplyDeleteWill definitely look into Stephen King - I've been meaning to read some of his, but there are so many to choose from . . . thanks for the recommendation!
DeleteYou're wanting uplifting fantasy, right? Is Rothfuss as dark as you're generally willing to go?
ReplyDeleteNo way - I take all fantasy. I actually find Rothfuss pretty uplifting/not very dark at all . . . but I can't think of any "dark" fantasy I know and like off hand. Time for me to branch out! What's recommended?
DeleteYou might be interested in the Dresden Files. It's contemporary fantasy in a fairly noir style, but it has strong themes of struggling to do the good thing, the right thing in a gray world. I *very* much enjoy the books, but I will offer a caveat. The series can get a bit ...libidinous. Not as bad as Game of Thrones, but the themes and characters result in a lot of descriptions of female bodies. If you find that especially obnoxious it may not be for you. If you're willing to give it a try I strongly recommend it.
ReplyDeleteP.S. "I read page-turners with deep characters written by authors that can create a serious situation that makes you both laugh and cry." fits it to a T.
Excellent. I have been intrigued by that author (J. Butcher), but I'm always hesitant to start series that seem to have a lot of books in them. I'm concerned they'll feel like too much tv: lots of fluff to draw something out unnecessary. I can deal with a little libidinousness (libidiosity!) for a good book. :) thanks!
DeleteThe series reads more like a procedural, one case/story per book with threads linking them together. One of my favorite parts of the series is seeing how the world and characters evolve between book, even though each story is fairly self-contained.
Delete